Skip to content

Researching artifacts

To ensure research into a new data format or artifact is forensically sound, they are preferably established via an automated, deterministic testing pipeline that isolates raw system observations, comprehensively documents the technical environment, and cross-validates results across multiple toolchains.

This article contains recommendedation regarding a structured approach to achieve reproducibility, testability, and bias reduction during your research.

Granular Environment & Version Documentation

To guarantee another examiner can replicate your exact findings, document the testing environment using strict version control and configurations. Avoid vague descriptions like "Windows 11" or "latest version."

  • Operating System Granularity: Record the exact operating system (OS) distribution, major/minor version, kernel version, OS build number, and installed patch level (e.g., Windows 11 Pro, Version 23H2, Build 22631.3165 or Ubuntu 22.04.4 LTS, Kernel 6.5.0-21-generic).
  • Application & Format Version: Note the precise version of the software creating the artifact, its architecture (32-bit vs. 64-bit), and any relevant compilation flags, dependency libraries, or plugin versions.
  • Temporal and Environmental Variables: Document the system time zone, time offsets relative to an external clock, network state (isolated, simulated, or live), and active security controls (like EDR or Antivirus) that might alter file behavior.

Testability & Artifact Generation

Manual data generation is prone to human error. Shift toward automated methodologies to test different versions of a format safely and deterministically.

  • Automated Real Tooling: Script the configuration and execution of the target software using PowerShell, Bash, or Python rather than clicking manually. This generates pristine "specimens" containing natural system side-effects.
  • Matrix Testing: Run your generation scripts across a matrix of different software versions to identify structural drift, schema updates, or changes in encoding behavior.
  • Peripheral Traces: Look beyond the isolated artifact file. Document the secondary telemetry created during generation, such as transaction logs, temporary file state, or background OS cache changes.

Measures to Reduce Bias and Errors

Cognitive biases and tool over-reliance frequently compromise forensic research. Implement rigorous operational controls to remain objective.

  • Isolate Observations from Conclusions: Dedicate a section of your research strictly to raw, unarguable digital traces (e.g., specific hex offsets, binary structures, exact timestamp strings). Keep interpretations regarding user intent or malicious activity completely separate.
  • Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH): Explicitly test alternative explanations. Instead of looking only for data that proves your theory, actively try to find scenarios where your theory breaks or yields different results.
  • Cross-Tool Validation: Validate your findings using multiple independent parsers. If creating your own parser, test it against public reference corpora to ensure your tool handles invalid UTF-8 sequences or malformed structures without lossy sanitization.

Alignment with the Pillars of Forensics

Your research must translate smoothly into the broader digital forensics lifecycle: Concepts, Methodologies, and Tools.

+--------------------------------------------------------+
|                    CONCEPTS                            |
| Explain the underlying file system, binary structures, |
| and metadata schemas governing the artifact.           |
+--------------------------+-----------------------------+
                           |
                           v
+--------------------------------------------------------+
|                  METHODOLOGIES                         |
| Define the SOPs for preserving, acquiring, and         |
| safely analyzing the artifact without data loss.       |
+--------------------------+-----------------------------+
                           |
                           v
+--------------------------------------------------------+
|                      TOOLS                             |
| Build or validate transparent, deterministic tools     |
| to parse the data, eliminating "black boxes".          |
+--------------------------------------------------------+
  • Concepts (The "Why"): Explain how the operating system or application handles the format under the hood (e.g., how space is allocated, how records are overwritten, or how encryption keys are managed).
  • Methodologies (The "How"): Define the exact Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) for the field. Address whether the artifact can be captured via live triage or if it requires a full bit-stream cryptographic image to preserve volatile components.
  • Tools (The Intermediaries): Ensure your parsing methodology is transparent. Document any edge cases where automated commercial tools fail, misinterpret timestamps, or create "black-box" discrepancies.

See Also